"We fight our way through the massed and levelled collective taste of the Top 40,
just looking for a little something we can call our own. But when we find it and
jam the radio to hear it again it isn’t just ours – it is a link to thousands of
others who are sharing it with us.
As a matter of a single song this might mean
very little; as culture, as a way of life, you can’t beat it."
Without a doubt, popular music is a primary, if not the primary, leisure
resource in late modern society. The sound of pop permeates people’s lives
in a variety of different ways.
From nightclubs and live gigs, through
cinemas and TV commercials, to what Japanese music theorist Hosokawa
(1984) refers to as the ‘autonomous and mobile’ form of listening facilitated
through the invention of the personal stereo; for a great many people,
popular music is an omnipresent aspect of their day-to-day existence
(Hosokawa 1984: 166).
As Frith (1987: 139) observes: ‘We absorb songs
into our own lives and rhythms into our own bodies; they have a looseness
of reference that makes them immediately accessible’.
Equally significant about popular music is the way in which it functions
at a collective level.
Every week in cities around the world people gather in
clubs and venues to listen and dance to their favourite musics. The summer
months bring festivals where music consumption is mixed with relaxation
and socializing as people forge new friendships and associations based
around common tastes in music, fashion and lifestyle.
Popular music has
also been linked with political issues and social change. In 1969, 500,000
people gathered at a rural site near the town of Woodstock in upstate New
York for the Woodstock Music and Art Fair, an event which, among other
things, protested about the US’s continuing involvement in the Vietnam war.
During the 1980s, popular music became the focus for a series of globally
broadcast mega-events (Garofalo 1992a), beginning with Bob Geldof’s Live Aid concerts in Britain and the US in aid of the famine in Ethiopia. Geldof
later described the Live Aid event as a ‘global joke box’ to raise awareness
about the famine.
Although the political naiveté of Live Aid has been justi-
fiably criticized (see, for example, Garofalo 1992b) the event’s principal success
was that it was able to focus, however briefly, people’s attention on a
world problem by utilizing a key element of their leisure and lifestyle.
Since the late 1960s, popular music has become a key focus in the related
disciplines of cultural and media studies and sociology. Every era of post Second
World War popular music, and the cultural scenes this music has
inspired, has been the subject of study in one or each of these disciplines at
some level.
"Leisure was no longer simply a moment of rest and recuperation from
work, the particular zone of family concerns and private edification. It
was widened into a potential life-style made possible by consumerism.
To buy a particular record, to choose a jacket or skirt cut to a particular
fashion, to mediate carefully on the colour of your shoes is to open
a door onto an actively constructed style of living."
Central to the new marketed youth identities, then, were items such as fashion
clothing, magazines and music. While all of these commodities played
their part in articulating the collective identity of youth, the most significant
aspect of post-war youth culture was the music which effectively became its
signature tune.
During the nineteenth century, commercial music had taken the form of
sheet music, most households across Europe and the US possessing a piano.
Thomas Edison’s invention of the phonograph during the
1880s in the US marked a fundamental change in the way in which music
was marketed and heard by people.
The cylindrical shaped phonograph was
the forerunner of the vinyl record and allowed for acoustic sounds to be
recorded and reproduced electronically.
"It sounded different from anything previous generations
had listened to. The whine of the electric guitar, the crisp drumming, the
echo effects, and, later, more complex mixtures of electric and acoustic
instruments, all made a new sound . . .
The generation that
had lived through the hard times of the depression and the Second
World War, preferred its music soft and romantic. Their children, growing
up in safer, more affluent times, wanted to hear more dangerous
music. They responded to simple chords, a jumping beat and loud electric
guitars."
Elvis Presley, who Beadle (1993) describes
as ‘the first pop star in the modern sense’, was working as a truck driver
when he was discovered by Sam Phillips, head of a small independent record
label, Sun Records, based in Memphis, Tennessee (Beadle 1993: 5). Presley
first visited Sun Records to record a song as a present for his mother’s birthday.
However, Sam Phillips was so impressed with Presley’s voice that he
invited him back to record some more material.
In keeping with the rise and appeal of rock ’n’ roll generally, the importance
of new technologies cannot be overlooked in attempting to chart the
cultural impact of Elvis Presley on young audiences. Presley first reached a
nationwide audience in the US through the medium of television. Indeed, in
the case of young people outside the US, Presley remained an essentially
‘mediated’ star, television appearances and subsequent films rather than live
performances being the way in which Presley was experienced on a global
level (apart from several impromptu performances in Germany during his
tour of duty there as a soldier in the US Army, Elvis never performed anywhere
outside the US). Moreover, the spectacle of Elvis on TV created a
moral panic among the parent culture which further endeared him to his
young fans
"When the Beatles arrived in the United States, which was still ostensibly
sobered by the assassination of President Kennedy two months before,
the fans knew what to do. Television had spread the word from England:
The approach of the Beatles is a licence to riot. At least 4,000 girls
(some estimates run as high as 10,000) greeted them at Kennedy
Airport, and hundreds laid siege to the Plaza Hotel, keeping the stars
virtual prisoners."
If mediated images of Elvis and the Beatles were instrumental in securing loyal
and enthusiastic audiences for these artists, they were also ensured the popularity
of Elvis and the Beatles on a global scale. If rock ’n’ roll was the first
musical form to exploit the potential of the global media, this in turn ensured
it gained an audience which went far beyond the US and Britain. Similarly, the
demand for rock ’n’ roll music resulted in the appearance of ‘home-grown’
rock ’n’ roll artists in many different countries throughout the world.
The history of popular music has long been debated by philosophers, sociologists, journalists, bloggers and pop stars.
While much has been written about the origin and evolution of pop, most claims about its history are anecdotal rather than scientific in nature. Popular genres, in fact, sometimes suffer a fate worse than death—becoming an anachronism and embarrassment, especially to young listeners eager to define themselves by allegiance to the latest style.
"The alluring, addictive sound of pop does still evolve, but what is sung about remains the more or less the same; the poses, controversies and costumes repetitive and derivative. It is machines that are now the new pop stars, the performers and singers like travelling sales workers whose ultimate job is to market phones, tablets, consoles, films, brands and safely maintain the illusion that the world is just as it was when there was vinyl and the constant, frantic turnover of talent, genre and style. There is today a tremendous amount of sentimentality in making it seem as though things are as they once were, a desperate future-fearing rearrangement of components that were hip 40 years ago.
But Pop belongs at the end of the 20th century, in a structured, ordered world that has now fallen apart."
1970
2015
No comments:
Post a Comment